IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v47y2017i2p260-281..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pre-Modern Disaster Politics: Combating Catastrophe in the 1950s

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth Davies

Abstract

In this essay, I investigate how the U.S. responded to disasters during the first decade after passage of the Federal Disaster Act of 1950. I examine mid-twentieth century disaster politics in relation to Martha Derthick’s observations about federalism during the Eisenhower era, drawing on a characterization of contemporary emergency management derived in part from her writings on the subject. Focusing on the Eisenhower Administration’s efforts to contain growing expectations regarding relief, I explain why, as late as the 1950s, a president could make that effort without incurring any political cost. Federal disaster politics in the 1950s was fundamentally different than in the contemporary era, and therefore it makes only limited sense to view the 1950 federal disaster act as marking the origin of contemporary disaster politics. The modern regime of disaster politics emerged afterward.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth Davies, 2017. "Pre-Modern Disaster Politics: Combating Catastrophe in the 1950s," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 260-281.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:47:y:2017:i:2:p:260-281.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjx016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Rowan & Kyle Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Assessing the Relationship between Social Vulnerability, Social Capital, and Housing Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:47:y:2017:i:2:p:260-281.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.