IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v43y2013i3p428-451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting, Adapting, and Opting Out: State Response to Federal Voting System Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Hale
  • Mitchell Brown

Abstract

This article examines the state response to voluntary federal certification of electronic voluntary voting system guidelines (VVSGs) and current intergovernmental issues surrounding electronic voting systems across the country. Federal certification is not widespread, and most states have adapted modified methods of assuring system integrity or have opted out altogether. States that participate in VVSG have greater technological sophistication, higher levels of election administration professionalism, and are more likely to adopt touchscreen voting machines. Unlike other election administration reforms, VVSG does not appear to be linked to partisan political factors. Our findings have implications for understanding the limits of voluntary federal programs and the importance of technological capacity and professional human resources in American election administration. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Hale & Mitchell Brown, 2013. "Adopting, Adapting, and Opting Out: State Response to Federal Voting System Guidelines," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 428-451, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:43:y:2013:i:3:p:428-451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjt016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:43:y:2013:i:3:p:428-451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.