IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v41yi4p610-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Autonomy versus State Constraints: Balancing Evolution and Creationism in U.S. High Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Michael B. Berkman
  • Eric Plutzer

Abstract

Do state curricular standards and examinations constrain the behavior of public school teachers? More specifically, do they interfere with teachers' responsiveness to local district preferences? We explore these questions in the highly contested arena of instruction in evolutionary biology. Drawing upon an original national survey of high school biology teachers, we find that their classroom practices conform to community preferences. This responsiveness occurs largely through a process of assortative employment. However, we show that teachers are less responsive to public opinion when state curricular standards are supported by high-stakes testing. We therefore offer a general model of how policy implementation can be influenced by local community sentiment and, more generally, how the architecture of public policy can attenuate responsiveness to local public opinion. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael B. Berkman & Eric Plutzer, 0. "Local Autonomy versus State Constraints: Balancing Evolution and Creationism in U.S. High Schools," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 610-635.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:41:y::i:4:p:610-635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjr008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:41:y::i:4:p:610-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.