IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v41yi4p586-609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do State Policies Constrain Local Actors? The Impact of English Only Laws on Language Instruction in Public Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa J. Marschall
  • Elizabeth Rigby
  • Jasmine Jenkins

Abstract

This study examines how instrumental and symbolic messages embedded in state law shape the practices of "street-level" bureaucrats. Specifically, we investigate whether passage of state-level English Only laws influences the way English language learners are instructed in local public schools. Using data on state English Only laws from 1987 to 2004 and school-level data from the National Center for Educational Statistics, we find that instrumental aspects of English Only laws serve to constrain, but not eliminate, schools' use of bilingual instruction, while those sending only symbolic messages are less constraining. Further, when state laws are vague in scope, adherence to the English Only law is dependent on the preferences of local actors, in this case Latino "cultural brokers" working in the public school system. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa J. Marschall & Elizabeth Rigby & Jasmine Jenkins, 0. "Do State Policies Constrain Local Actors? The Impact of English Only Laws on Language Instruction in Public Schools," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 586-609.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:41:y::i:4:p:586-609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjr003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:41:y::i:4:p:586-609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.