IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v39y2009i2p289-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Devolution in the United Kingdom: Problems of a Piecemeal Approach to Constitutional Change

Author

Listed:
  • Charlie Jeffery

Abstract

The UK's devolution reforms have been piecemeal, directed at specific territorial issues in one or other part of the UK, and poorly coordinated with one another. While this piecemeal approach reflects a centuries-old approach to territorial statecraft in the UK, the addition since 1999 of democratic process and, more recently, partisan conflict between UK and devolved government, has established strong centrifugal tendencies. The article explores how territorial policy variation, inter-regional spillovers, the fusion of UK central government institutions with those for governing England, contradictions in public opinion, and under-institutionalized intergovernmental relations underline that centrifugal dynamic. Most significantly there has been no sustained attempt to review and renew the purposes of union since devolution. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlie Jeffery, 2009. "Devolution in the United Kingdom: Problems of a Piecemeal Approach to Constitutional Change," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 289-313, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:39:y:2009:i:2:p:289-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjn038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:39:y:2009:i:2:p:289-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.