IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v34y2004i4p1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservative Perspectives on American Federalism: Introduction

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly Hendrickson

Abstract

Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the “Lochner Court” were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly Hendrickson, 2004. "Conservative Perspectives on American Federalism: Introduction," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 1-8, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:4:p:1-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Troy E. Smith, 2017. "A Compound Republic—If You Can Keep It: Martha Derthick’s Empiricism and the Value of Federalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 153-170.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:4:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.