IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v33y2003i3p123-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Shadow of Sharia Over Nigerian Federalism

Author

Listed:
  • J. Isawa Elaigwu
  • Habu Galadima

Abstract

The sentencing under Sharia law in Nigeria's northern state of Katsina in 2002 of a 31-year-old woman, Amina Lawal, to be stoned to death for adultery highlighted the rising religious conflict and violence that has occurred since the resumption of civilian democratic governance in 1999. Although the practice of Sharia in personal and civil matters had been accommodated by the British and by Nigeria's various constitutions, what was new in 1999 was the extension of Sharia from civil to criminal matters, thus producing such punishments as decapitation, amputation, and stoning to death, threatening the well-being of non-Muslims, endangering fundamental rights protected by Nigeria's federal Constitution, and posing significant challenges to elected officials and federal courts. The extension of Sharia to criminal law in 12 northern states also has increased intercommunal and intergovernmental conflict, threatening the fabric of Nigerian federalism. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Isawa Elaigwu & Habu Galadima, 2003. "The Shadow of Sharia Over Nigerian Federalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 33(3), pages 123-144, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:33:y:2003:i:3:p:123-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:33:y:2003:i:3:p:123-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.