IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v32y2002i3p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Congressional Responses to the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • John Dinan

Abstract

Scholars who have sought to assess the consequences of the Rehnquist Court's federalism decisions have identified various means by which Congress can overcome the effects of these rulings, but there have been few efforts to investigate the degree to which Congress has employed these means. This study finds that Congress has enjoyed limited success in responding to the Court's rulings. Significantly, though, the failure to overcome the effects of these decisions is rarely attributable to the fact that the Court's constitutional doctrines have erected insurmountable barriers to congressional action. Rather, the Court's decisions have forced congressional supporters of the invalidated statutory provisions to build and hold political coalitions in support of the repassage of these laws, and this has frequently proved to be difficult to accomplish, whether due to a lack of enthusiasm for such efforts, conflicts with other policy goals, or opposition from other groups. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Dinan, 2002. "Congressional Responses to the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Decisions," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 1-24, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:3:p:1-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:3:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.