IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v32y2002i2p147-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian Federalism: A Prospective Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Galligan
  • John S. F. Wright

Abstract

On 1 January 2001, Australia celebrated the centenary of its federal Constitution. Throughout its history, the Australian federal system has proved both resilient and flexible, serving the Commonwealth through the trials of depression, total war, imperial decline, and economic reconstruction. The constitutional system has been developed through interpretation by the High Court and popular input via referendums, as well as by the ongoing process of intergovernmental relations. There has been an overall expansion of Commonwealth powers with the politics of nation-building, but the states remain significantly powerful although financially dependent on the Commonwealth. Given the institutional and popular success of Australian federalism, the challenges facing the Commonwealth in the new century are not expected to be domestic or constitutional, but strategic and economic: principally, how a smallish middle power should meet the difficulties of globalization and security from a position of relative isolation adjacent to Asia in the southern Pacific. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Galligan & John S. F. Wright, 2002. "Australian Federalism: A Prospective Assessment," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 147-166, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:2:p:147-166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:2:p:147-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.