IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v32y2002i1p65-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State and Local Government Officials' Perspectives on Intergovernmental Relationships in Surface Transportation Policy: 1987 and 2001

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Jay Dilger

Abstract

This article reports results of nationwide surveys of state and local government officials conducted in 2000/2001 concerning their perspectives on intergovernmental relationships in surface transportation. It then compares the survey results with the results from a 1987 survey on the same topic that was conducted by the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Although there was some variation among the categories of state and local government officials surveyed, overall, both state and local government officials report that they are relatively satisfied with intergovernmental relationships in surface transportation and that those relationships have generally improved since 1987. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Jay Dilger, 2002. "State and Local Government Officials' Perspectives on Intergovernmental Relationships in Surface Transportation Policy: 1987 and 2001," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 65-85, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:1:p:65-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:1:p:65-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.