IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi3p205-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changing Public Attitudes on Power and Taxation in the American Federal System

Author

Listed:
  • John Kincaid
  • Richard L. Cole

Abstract

The research reported here updates for 2001 some public opinion data previously provided by the U. S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. The 2001 survey results indicate a general continuation of earlier opinion trends. The federal government is viewed as providing citizens the least for their money; the federal income lax, followed by the local properly tax, is seen as the worst lax; a majority of the public indicates that local governments need more power; the public is most likely to identify the federal government as having too much power; and the public is least likely to say that the federal government needs more power. For the most part, these attitudes are held without much variation by all categories of respondents; however, region, education, and, to a lesser extent, a few other demographic variables do distinguish among respondents in a statistically significant manner. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Kincaid & Richard L. Cole, 0. "Changing Public Attitudes on Power and Taxation in the American Federal System," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(3), pages 205-214.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:3:p:205-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vaubel, Roland, 2003. "Principal-Agent-Probleme in internationalen Organisationen," HWWA Discussion Papers 219, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:3:p:205-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.