IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v28yi2p129-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Initial Evaluation of Revenue-Sharing Arrangements in the New South African Fiscal Federalism

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Dollery

Abstract

The new Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 1996 has restructured South Africa as a nonracial federal polity comprised of a national government, nine provincial authorities, and about 700 municipalities. The Constitution specifically created a Financial and Fiscal Commission to organize and manage a new system of intergovernmental grants designed to ameliorate vertical fiscal imbalance and deliver horizontal equity to governments at all levels. This examination of the characteristics and mechanics of South African federalism seeks to classify these new institutional arrangements in terms of the typology developed by Roy Bahl and Johannes Linn and interpret their policy implications. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Dollery, 0. "An Initial Evaluation of Revenue-Sharing Arrangements in the New South African Fiscal Federalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 28(2), pages 129-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:2:p:129-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Alm & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez *, 2015. "Re-designing equalization transfers: an application to South Africa provincial equitable share," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(1), pages 1-22, January-M.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:2:p:129-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.