IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v27yi3p113-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Capacity, Fiscal Need, and Fiscal Comfort among U.S. States: New Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Tannenwald
  • Jonathan Cowan

Abstract

During its lifetime, the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations periodically published estimates of each state's relative fiscal capacity. This research note provides new estimates updated to fiscal year 1994, the latest year for which all requisite underlying data are available. We find that dispersion in capacity narrowed from 1987 to 1994, largely because the capacities of California and the Northeast states, historically enjoying ample capacity, fell relative to the national average. We also find that these states generally experienced an increase in relative fiscal need, further narrowing interstate dispersion in fiscal comfort (capacity relative to need). We conclude with evidence suggesting that states with low fiscal comfort generally prefer relatively low levels of state and local public services. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Tannenwald & Jonathan Cowan, 0. "Fiscal Capacity, Fiscal Need, and Fiscal Comfort among U.S. States: New Evidence," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 113-126.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:27:y::i:3:p:113-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:27:y::i:3:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.