IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v27yi2p167-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hawaiian Sovereignty

Author

Listed:
  • Norman Meller
  • Anne Feder Lee

Abstract

The movement for national sovereignty among persons of Hawaiian ancestry has burgeoned during the last several decades, with some seeking secession of the State of Hawai'i from the American Union. The movement's roots are multiple, among which figures prominently the overthrow of Queen Lili'uokalani in 1893 with the connivance of the armed forces of the United States, for which the U. S. Congress recently apologized. Some indigenous Hawaiians dismiss the annexation of Hawai'i and its subsequent statehood as having occurred without their independent choice. The Hawaiian sovereignty movement may be roughly divided into three categories: “Hawaiian Nation Separatists” supporting an independent Hawai'i nation; “Nation-within-a-Nation” advocates desiring a status comparable to that of American Indians; and those Hawaiians supporting the status quo but with redress in many forms. Steps are underway to hold constitutional convention of all Hawaiians to propose a native Hawaiian government. Whether the U.S. Congress can respond to the thrust of the movement within the constraints of the American federal system remains problematical. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Meller & Anne Feder Lee, 0. "Hawaiian Sovereignty," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 167-185.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:27:y::i:2:p:167-185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:27:y::i:2:p:167-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.