IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v26yi4p99-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Integration and Citizens' Rights: A Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth M. Meehan

Abstract

The prospects for European Union citizenship are sometimes discounted by reference to homogeneity in the United States compared to diversity in the European Union. This article suggests that there may be more similarities between the two systems than is sometimes supposed by many observers. Even though there are important differences, both systems have had to address similar questions about how to combine the benefits of integration and the protection of rights. In discussing the common and divergent features, the author argues that comparison also reveals the possibility that it is diversity, not homogeneity, that is necessary to the protection of citizenship's rights. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth M. Meehan, 0. "European Integration and Citizens' Rights: A Comparative Perspective," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 99-121.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:26:y::i:4:p:99-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sophie Duchesne, André-Paul Frognier, 2007. "Why Is it so Difficult to Know if National Pride Leads the Way to European Identity or Prevents it ?," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:26:y::i:4:p:99-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.