IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/polsoc/v44y2025i4p568-580..html

The ways that external and internal dynamics influence intermediaries in the climate policy process

Author

Listed:
  • Ciara Kelly
  • Paul Tobin
  • Elizabeth Bailes
  • James Jackson

Abstract

“Climate intermediaries” are important for climate governance, as they can strengthen mitigation efforts by drawing enable diverse insights into the policy process. However, actors wishing to intermediate may be stymied from assuming such a role; hence, there is a need for a greater understanding of whether and how, organizations can act as climate intermediaries. We investigate in what ways external governance dynamics surrounding an organization can influence their intermediation, and further, in what ways these external dynamics produce internal dynamics that influence intermediation still further. We find that externally, the presence of funding limitations, competition between intermediaries, and unwilling or inappropriate intermediation partners can influence nongovernmental organizations (NGOs’) pursuit of intermediation. Moreover, by examining internal dynamics, we see that these external dynamics challenge NGOs’ strategy-making, staff well-being, and maintenance of expertise, which impact their organization’s intermediation still further. Resultantly, we propose that despite intermediaries being a crucial component of the post-Paris Agreement climate policymaking process, the governance arrangements that surround NGOs impact their ability to assume this role, with attendant implications for limiting the diversity of insights into the policy process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ciara Kelly & Paul Tobin & Elizabeth Bailes & James Jackson, 2025. "The ways that external and internal dynamics influence intermediaries in the climate policy process," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 44(4), pages 568-580.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:44:y:2025:i:4:p:568-580.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/polsoc/puaf011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:44:y:2025:i:4:p:568-580.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.