Author
Listed:
- Laurence L Delina
- Lei Shi
- Wiwik Dharmiasih
- Albert Salamanca
- Kim-Pong Tam
Abstract
This article examines the impact of informal intermediaries on heritage governance within Southeast Asia’s indigenous rice-farming communities. By conducting a comparative study of Bali and Ifugao, we analyze how local heritage leaders navigate the interplay between heritage preservation, economic development, and the challenges of modernization, particularly those arising from agricultural heritage tourism. Our findings reveal the intricate nature of these intermediation processes and highlight the evolving roles of local intermediaries within the Regulation-Intermediaries-Target (RIT) Model. We demonstrate that Bali’s kelian and pekaseh, alongside Ifugao’s tonong and mumbaki, are facilitators of agricultural practices and custodians of cultural heritage, adeptly managing the balance between modernity and tradition. Furthermore, our research demonstrates how Indigenous intermediaries adapt to shifting governance dynamics, which are shaped by both formal and informal structures, influencing resource flows and community engagement. This study contributes to the intermediation literature by revealing the limitations of conventional frameworks in addressing the complexities of informal intermediation. Our results underscore the necessity for a nuanced understanding of intermediaries, acknowledging their dynamic, ambiguous, and contested roles in heritage governance. Ultimately, we advocate for a more integrated approach that recognizes the vital role of Indigenous intermediaries in managing cultural landscapes amid contemporary challenges.
Suggested Citation
Laurence L Delina & Lei Shi & Wiwik Dharmiasih & Albert Salamanca & Kim-Pong Tam, 2025.
"Heritage governance in Bali and Ifugao ricescapes: exploring the dynamic roles of Indigenous intermediaries in cultural preservation and development,"
Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 44(4), pages 549-567.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:44:y:2025:i:4:p:549-567.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:44:y:2025:i:4:p:549-567.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.