IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/polsoc/v41y2022i2p306-320..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities and the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: analyzing un-coordinated responses in social assistance and education
[Combate à COVID-19 sob o federalismo bolsonarista: Um caso de descoordenação intergovernamental]

Author

Listed:
  • Catarina Ianni Segatto
  • Fernando Burgos Pimentel dos Santos
  • Renata Mirandola Bichir
  • Eliana Lins Morandi

Abstract

This paper contributes to discussions about subnational responses to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in federal countries. In the scholarship on federalism and public policy, few studies seek to understand the factors that shape subnational differences in welfare levels. This article seeks to better understand this issue in Brazil by exploring how, in a context with little national-level coordination, subnational governments tackle the inequalities exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzes two social policy areas with distinct national-level coordination mechanisms and federal responsibilities: social assistance and education. Two multi-level cases are examined: the states of Amazonas and São Paulo and the cities of Manaus and São Paulo. This analysis relies on quantitative data, mainly social indicators, and qualitative data collected through documents and in-depth interviews. Social assistance and education policy actors in Amazonas and São Paulo faced at times significant obstacles adapting and/or creating policies to tackle inequalities, resulting in a fend-for-yourself federalism and fragmented subnational policies. Differences in subnational responses can be explained by distinct policy legacies and previous capacity, which were key in organizing a useful response to the pandemic. However, to fully explain subnational responses, the role of actors within institutional contexts must also be taken into account. In social assistance, shared responsibilities among different levels of government led to competition and credit claiming dynamics, reinforcing fragmented and uncoordinated responses. In education, decentralization and more stable funding allowed political leadership to activate and mobilize subnational capacities and other actors at the subnational level, producing more sustainable responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Catarina Ianni Segatto & Fernando Burgos Pimentel dos Santos & Renata Mirandola Bichir & Eliana Lins Morandi, 2022. "Inequalities and the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: analyzing un-coordinated responses in social assistance and education [Combate à COVID-19 sob o federalismo bolsonarista: Um caso de descoordenação," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 306-320.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:41:y:2022:i:2:p:306-320.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/polsoc/puac005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:gig:joupla:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:155-183 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph Antwi-Boasiako & Griselda Asamoah-Gyadu, 2023. "Government Preparedness Towards Ebola and Covid-19 Health Crises in Ghana," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 515-530, June.
    2. Daniel Béland & Alex Jingwei He & M Ramesh, 2022. "COVID-19, crisis responses, and public policies: from the persistence of inequalities to the importance of policy design [The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 187-198.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:41:y:2022:i:2:p:306-320.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.