IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v45y2025i1p81-107..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Three-Tier Structural Legal Deficit Undermining the Protection of Employees’ Personal Data in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Einat Albin

Abstract

—Even though personal data protection is a fundamental right, and legislation and the courts aim to pursue it, in practice, employees have no meaningful protection of their personal data within the workplace and have few opportunities to act, individually or collectively, to ensure the security of their data. In this article, I argue that a central reason for this state of affairs is the intersection of labour law and personal data protection regulation that creates a three-tier structural legal deficit. The three tiers are: the basic structure of labour law that ensures employer prerogative to use new technologies that are based on datafication almost unlimitedly; the consumer orientation of personal data protection regulation under the General Data Protection Regulation; and lack of specific labour law tools to protect personal data. By building on the structural understanding of the law, and by unravelling the three tiers, the article proposes robust labour law tools to enhance the protection of employees’ personal data.

Suggested Citation

  • Einat Albin, 2025. "The Three-Tier Structural Legal Deficit Undermining the Protection of Employees’ Personal Data in the Workplace," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 81-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:81-107.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqae033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:81-107.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.