IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v45y2025i1p217-243..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Digital) Things as Objects of Property Rights: What Can Crypto Learn From Comparative Law?†

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Held

Abstract

This review article engages critically with Christian von Bar’s proposed definition of things as objects of property rights and their proposed place as one category in a tripartite taxonomy of the objects of private law; both expounded as part of a broader aim of bringing together the property laws of the Member States of the European Union and the UK as part of a single picture. The article first contextualises these proposals against the background of the UNIDROIT Principles on Digital Assets and the ongoing debates in England and Wales as to the property status of cryptoassets such as bitcoin; then offers a primer for both common law and civilian law readers on the structure, content and objectives of the book. After setting out the proposed taxonomy and the core theses upon which it is premised, the article then evaluates von Bar’s proposals and illustrates how they can inform and guide the debates as international and domestic laws grapple with the challenges posed by new and novel objects of economic value. The book under review is an abridged version of the first two parts of Gemeineuropäisches Sachenrecht, originally published in German by CH Beck in 2015, which were translated into English by Jason Grant Allen and reworked into a standalone text published by OUP in 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Held, 2025. "(Digital) Things as Objects of Property Rights: What Can Crypto Learn From Comparative Law?†," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 217-243.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:217-243.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqae034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:217-243.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.