IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v45y2025i1p138-166..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Privacy–Equality Synthesis: Framing Reproductive Rights in India

Author

Listed:
  • Gauri Pillai

Abstract

Reproductive rights are typically framed as engaging one’s constitutional right to privacy. However, with increasing contestations around the right to privacy, the right to equality has been proposed as an alternate frame. Often, a choice tends to be constructed between the two. Challenging this, some argue for both privacy and equality to be included in framing constitutional reproductive rights. This approach places emphasis on the combined presence of the two rights. Indian constitutional law offers a third, distinct possibility, moving beyond mere rights addition to reading rights in ‘synthesis’. The synthesis pays close attention to the site of dynamic rights interaction, highlighting the effects of the rights on one another. This method of rights analysis, and its latent potential, remains dormant within constitutional doctrine in India. Resurrecting it, and studying examples of abortion and maternal mortality, I frame reproductive rights through the synthesis between privacy and equality. In functioning as a magnifier, a catalyst and a backstop, the synthesis alters the constitutional imagination of reproductive rights in India while, simultaneously, advancing an insightful paradigm for constitutional reproductive rights globally and rights analyses generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Gauri Pillai, 2025. "The Privacy–Equality Synthesis: Framing Reproductive Rights in India," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 138-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:138-166.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqae039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:138-166.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.