IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v41y2025i1p120-139..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal redistribution cycles: four decades of social assistance in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • David Coady

Abstract

This paper describes the evolution of fiscal redistribution (FR) in the UK through social assistance transfers over the last four decades and the contribution of each of its determinants: budget effort (the share of national income devoted to redistributive transfers) and transfer progressivity (the extent to which these transfers are concentrated on lower-income households). Trends in FR have been driven by a combination of economic and political cycles. Over the 1980s and 1990s, the heavy reliance on means-tested transfers indexed to prices resulted in FR fluctuating over the ‘economic cycle’. Over recent decades, FR has been driven primarily by ‘political cycles’. Under a Labour government (1997–2010), a large expansion of coverage of in-work benefits resulted in an unprecedented, sustained increase in effort which, despite decreasing progressivity, was large enough to ensure a continuous rise in FR. This increase was reversed under a Conservative-led government from 2010 in the context of fiscal austerity, which decreased effort and increased progressivity as remaining transfers were concentrated more on lower-income households. A striking feature over the last four decades has been the sharp decline in FR to the poorest income decile under different political leadership as emphasis has shifted to reducing in-work rather than out-of-work poverty and ‘making work pay’.

Suggested Citation

  • David Coady, 2025. "Fiscal redistribution cycles: four decades of social assistance in the UK," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 120-139.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:120-139.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/graf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:120-139.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.