IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v38y2022i1p68-81..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: lessons learnt

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Bennett
  • David Vines

Abstract

This paper analyses the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) between the EU and the UK. We focus on two specific features: rules of origin and non-tariff barriers. The putative purpose of the TCA was to promote free trade between the signatories, and both of the features identified have ‘level-playing-field’ objectives which are designed to promote that purpose. However, both can also be used for covert protectionism against the other party to the agreement. The paper recommends that rules of origin and non-tariff barriers should be recrafted where possible, and there is a description of how this might be done. The aim of such action would be to make transparent the role of these features in preserving a level playing field. Doing this would also make clear that any residual unadulterated rules of origin and non-tariff barriers existed for purely protectionist reasons and jeopardized open borders. Hopefully, the exposure of such protectionism would encourage its dismantlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Bennett & David Vines, 2022. "The EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: lessons learnt," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(1), pages 68-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:68-81.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grab049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:68-81.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.