IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v28y2012i1p22-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Giles Atkinson
  • Ian Bateman
  • Susana Mourato

Abstract

Recent interest in the economics of biodiversity and wider ecosystem services has been given empirical expression through a focus upon economic valuation. This emphasis has been prompted by a growing recognition that the benefits and opportunity costs associated with such services are frequently given cursory consideration in policy analyses or even completely ignored. The valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services is therefore increasingly seen as a crucial element of robust decision making and this has been reflected in a growing body of related research. We provide a critical review of some of this research, considering the valuation methods applied to date and focussing upon their limitations in respect to certain categories of ecosystem services (particularly cultural services) and the applicability of the extant literature to new settings. Substantial questions also remain at the interface of natural science and economics and we consider the potential contribution of the conceptualization of ecosystems as assets as a response to this challenge. As part of this review we also highlight the role which large scale ‘ecosystem assessments’ have played as an impetus to extending the valuation evidence base and the way in which frameworks and assessments of how ecosystems contribute to human wellbeing might be translated into policy thinking and decision analyses. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Giles Atkinson & Ian Bateman & Susana Mourato, 2012. "Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 22-47, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2012:i:1:p:22-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grs007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartkowski, Bartosz, 2016. "Are diverse ecosystems more valuable? A conceptual framework of the economic value of biodiversity," 90th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2016, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 236293, Agricultural Economics Society.
    2. repec:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pa:p:109-119 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:eee:ecoser:v:9:y:2014:i:c:p:98-105 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Bartkowski, Bartosz & Lienhoop, Nele & Hansjürgens, Bernd, 2015. "Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-14.
    5. repec:eee:ecolec:v:139:y:2017:i:c:p:140-149 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1419-:d:144436 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Baker, Rick & Ruting, Brad, 2014. "Environmental Policy Analysis: A Guide to Non‑Market Valuation," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165810, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. repec:eee:ecoser:v:26:y:2017:i:pb:p:377-387 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:ags:afjrde:263438 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5285-:d:270708 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Zanoli, Raffaele & Carlesi, Lorenzo & Danovaro, Roberto & Mandolesi, Serena & Naspetti, Simona, 2015. "Valuing unfamiliar Mediterranean deep-sea ecosystems using visual Q-methodology," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 227-236.
    12. repec:eee:ecoser:v:8:y:2014:i:c:p:141-147 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ray Ison & Monica Shelley & Martin J. Bunch, 2016. "Ecosystem Approaches to Health and Well-Being: Navigating Complexity, Promoting Health in Social–Ecological Systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 614-632, September.
    14. Cranford, Matthew & Mourato, Susana, 2014. "Credit-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 503-520.
    15. repec:eee:ecoser:v:10:y:2014:i:c:p:84-96 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:eee:soceco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:95-104 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Valatin, Gregory & Moseley, Darren & Dandy, Norman, 2016. "Insights from behavioural economics for forest economics and environmental policy: Potential nudges to encourage woodland creation for climate change mitigation and adaptation?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-36.
    18. repec:wsi:wepxxx:v:03:y:2017:i:02:n:s2382624x17020027 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:eee:forpol:v:107:y:2019:i:c:3 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Scholte, Samantha S.K. & van Teeffelen, Astrid J.A. & Verburg, Peter H., 2015. "Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 67-78.
    21. repec:eee:ecoser:v:14:y:2015:i:c:p:88-97 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:eee:ecolec:v:163:y:2019:i:c:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. repec:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:361-:d:197116 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. repec:eee:ecoser:v:9:y:2014:i:c:p:5-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. repec:eee:ecoser:v:18:y:2016:i:c:p:100-109 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2012:i:1:p:22-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.