IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v14y1998i1p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Assessment: Economic Policy and Social Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Glyn, Andrew

Abstract

The economic objectives of recent governments of the Left were full employment, reducing inequality, and enhancing economic performance and democratic control by measures of planning and socialization. The economic inheritance was difficult--stagnant investment, high unemployment in a number of cases, and inflation higher than that of competitors. The generalized productivity slow-down, slow growth, and the drive to reduce inflation represented an unfavourable context. The supply-side interventions atrophied, were abandoned or reversed. Employment performance was poor overall and sometimes disastrous. Some extensions of the welfare state were achieved and major increases in inequality were avoided, but this record was hardly exceptional. Globalization is often blamed for such disappointments. Here, the emphasis is on the inherent difficulties of the social democratic project--containing distributional conflict other than by unemployment, sustaining support for redistribution when living standards are stagnating, and constraining business while relying on it to maintain high investment. Copyright 1998 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Glyn, Andrew, 1998. "The Assessment: Economic Policy and Social Democracy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:14:y:1998:i:1:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bharatee Dash & Angara Raja, 2013. "Do political determinants affect the size and composition of public expenditure? A study of the Indian states," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 60(3), pages 293-317, September.
    2. Bharatee Dash & Angara Raja, 2014. "Do political determinants affect revenue collection? Evidence from the Indian states," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 61(3), pages 253-278, September.
    3. Ben Fine, 1999. "Whither the Welfare State: Public versus Private Consumption?," Working Papers 92, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:14:y:1998:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.