IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v68y2016i1p1-15..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's Choice Publick Stews and the genesis of public economics

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Elmslie

Abstract

In 1724, the anonymous essay A Modest Defence of Publick Stews (brothels) arrived in the bookshops of London. Now the essay is widely believed to be the work of Bernard Mandeville. In true heretical fashion, Mandeville detailed the social problems arising from the market in prostitution of his day. The genius of the work comes from the sophisticated tools, previously thought to be the product of the twentieth century, he utilized to analyse the market. These tools included the market failures of externalities and asymmetric information; government failures due to unintended consequences of public policies; and a proposal for regulating the market designed to alleviate these failings. Included in the proposal was a tax consistent with the principles of a first-best policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Elmslie, 2016. "Editor's Choice Publick Stews and the genesis of public economics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 1-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:68:y:2016:i:1:p:1-15.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpv060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:68:y:2016:i:1:p:1-15.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.