IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v61y2009isuppl_1pi35-i55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Panel estimates of the wage penalty for maternal leave

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Buligescu
  • Denis de Crombrugghe
  • Gülçin Menteşoğlu
  • Raymond Montizaan

Abstract

The focus of this paper is the size of the wage penalty due to maternal leave incurred by working mothers in Germany. Existing estimates suggest large penalties with little rebound over time. We apply recent panel data methods designed to address problems of sample selectivity, unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity to German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) data. Heckman's classic treatment of selectivity is extended to deal with both heterogeneity and simultaneity. In order to exploit the actual working hours data available in GSOEP, we develop the case of a censored tobit participation model. We also investigate the sensitivity of the results to the choice of method. Our estimates imply a maternal leave wage penalty of 10 to 14% which is less persistent over time than other studies suggest. Five years after the return to work maternal wages have caught up. Copyright 2009 Oxford University Press 2008 All rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Buligescu & Denis de Crombrugghe & Gülçin Menteşoğlu & Raymond Montizaan, 2009. "Panel estimates of the wage penalty for maternal leave," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 61(suppl_1), pages 35-55, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:61:y:2009:i:suppl_1:p:i35-i55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpn042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:61:y:2009:i:suppl_1:p:i35-i55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.