IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v61y2009i1p197-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The voluntary provision of a pure public good and the Montreal Protocol: behavioral and data concerns

Author

Listed:
  • James C. Murdoch
  • Todd Sandler

Abstract

This article argues that the World Resources Institute (WRI) data are appropriate for our game-theoretic-based analysis of countries' CFC emission cutbacks prior to the ratification of the Protocol. Given the underlying game from which our reduced-form equations follow, the policymakers must be viewed as responding to contemporary information, which was the WRI dataset. The article also addresses the issue of an alleged perfect correlation being induced between CFC emission cutbacks and GNP due to the imputation process used by WRI. The article also raises concerns about inventory inclusion in the United Nations Environmental Programme data that could distort cutbacks for major producer countries that were likely to stockpile CFCs before production lines were shifted over to CFC substitutes. Copyright 2009 , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • James C. Murdoch & Todd Sandler, 2009. "The voluntary provision of a pure public good and the Montreal Protocol: behavioral and data concerns," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 61(1), pages 197-200, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:61:y:2009:i:1:p:197-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpn022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parag Chandra & Saptorshee Kanto Chakraborty, 2017. "A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Transnational Public Goods (TPGs) to Upgrade Environmental Quality," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 15(2), pages 227-240, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:61:y:2009:i:1:p:197-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.