Homeownership, Committed Expenditure Risk, and the Stockholding Puzzle
Kimball (1991) showed that consumers who face an unavoidable risk will display "temperance", meaning that they will increase their holdings of safe assets. In principle, temperance could provide an explanation for the stockholding puzzle, which is the microeconomic manifestation of the equity premium puzzle. Previous work has shown that the temperance effect induced by labor income uncertainty is too small to explain the stockholding puzzle. This paper finds that committed expenditure risk associated with homeownership induces enough additional temperance to explain the puzzle. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 53 (2001)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://oep.oupjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:53:y:2001:i:2:p:241-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.