IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v45y1993i1p148-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Irish Paper Pound of 1797-1820: Some Cliometrics of the Bullionist Debate

Author

Listed:
  • O Grada, Cormac

Abstract

The analysis of the celebrated Bullion Report of 1810 was anticipated in large part by the lesser-known Currency Report of 1804. Both claimed that the phenomena under investigation--the depreciation of the Irish pound in 1803-04 and the rise in the price of gold in 1808-10--were exclusively monetary in origin. The paper uses cointegration techniques in order to test the proposition of the Irish Report. In that case, a 'hard' bullionist interpretation is insufficient to account for the observed exchange rate movements. Copyright 1993 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • O Grada, Cormac, 1993. "The Irish Paper Pound of 1797-1820: Some Cliometrics of the Bullionist Debate," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 148-156, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:45:y:1993:i:1:p:148-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28199301%292%3A45%3A1%3C148%3ATIPPO1%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:45:y:1993:i:1:p:148-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.