IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v41y1989i2p374-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could Lloyd George Have Done It? The Pledge Re-examined

Author

Listed:
  • Matthews, K G P

Abstract

This paper sets out to examine the question posed by J. M. Keynes and H. Henderson in 1929--Can Lloyd George do it? Stated badly, could a monetary-financed, expansionary fiscal policy have pulled Britain out of the depression of the 1930s and have reduced unemployment permanently? This question is examined with the aid of the Liverpool Macroeconomic Model estimated for the interwar period. The model incorporates stock-flow equilibrium, rational expectations, and an explicit supply side. It is concluded that, since the money value of unemployment benefits was determined independently of the price level, Lloyd George could indeed have done it. Copyright 1989 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthews, K G P, 1989. "Could Lloyd George Have Done It? The Pledge Re-examined," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 374-407, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:41:y:1989:i:2:p:374-407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28198904%292%3A41%3A2%3C374%3ACLGHDI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kent Matthews, 2013. "No Plan B: But is There a ‘Third Way'?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 220-231, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:41:y:1989:i:2:p:374-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.