IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v39y1987i4p738-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology, Productivity, and Profits: British-American Whaling Competition in the North Atlantic, 1816-1842

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, L E
  • Gallman, R E
  • Hutchins, T D

Abstract

In 1815, the North Atlantic whaling fleet was entirely British, but by 1842 almost every ve ssel was American. This paper analyzes the productivity and profitabi lity of the two fleets in an attempt to explain the near total Americ an victory in the competitive struggle off Greenland and in the Davis Straights. The analysis indicates that the American fleet was more p roductive and considerably more profitable, but that neither producti vity or profit differentials can completely explain the speed of the transition. A complete explanation must also include the effects of c hanges in British government policy. Copyright 1987 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, L E & Gallman, R E & Hutchins, T D, 1987. "Technology, Productivity, and Profits: British-American Whaling Competition in the North Atlantic, 1816-1842," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 738-759, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:39:y:1987:i:4:p:738-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28198712%292%3A39%3A4%3C738%3ATPAPBW%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:39:y:1987:i:4:p:738-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.