IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/medlaw/v33y2025i3pfwaf034..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Let’s talk about AIDS, baby! Critiquing the HIV and AIDS Act, 2017 in India through a reproductive justice framework

Author

Listed:
  • Apoorva Nangia
  • Jwalika Balaji

Abstract

The HIV and AIDS Act was enacted in India in 2017 to protect the right to privacy, bodily autonomy, and non-discrimination of Persons Living with HIV (PLHIV). Prior to the Act, HIV/AIDS-related jurisprudence in India developed largely through judicial decisions on privacy, health care, queer rights, and marriage. This jurisprudence stigmatised PLHIV and constructed them as threats to society. The Act sought to respond to such characterisations and affirmed several rights of PLHIV that were previously denied. This article uses the reproductive justice framework to analyse the scope and potential of the Act in furthering sexual and reproductive freedoms of PLHIV and their partners. The article argues that despite the various rights and anti-discrimination protections under the Act, the law is insufficient to address the systemic and structural issues affecting PLHIV. The Act is premised on the problematic assumption that PLHIV are ‘risky’ sexual subjects, which affects the construction of rights and benefits. Furthermore, the Act does not, and arguably cannot, holistically address the problems faced by PLHIV in sexual, marital, and familial relationships. These constraints are a crucial reminder of the larger limitation of law as a blunt policy tool that is unable to comprehensively address complex socio-legal issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Apoorva Nangia & Jwalika Balaji, 2025. "Let’s talk about AIDS, baby! Critiquing the HIV and AIDS Act, 2017 in India through a reproductive justice framework," Medical Law Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 1-034..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:fwaf034.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:fwaf034.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/medlaw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.