IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/medlaw/v33y2025i3pfwaf029..html

Towards an international consensus on cross-border surrogacy: the role of the European Court of Human Rights?

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Valc

Abstract

The article examines ways to address the problems of cross-border surrogacy, based on existing initiatives to create an international legal framework and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). I will first outline the problems associated with cross-border surrogacy and describe efforts to overcome these problems by adopting an international treaty or universally accepted standards in this area. Then I turn my attention to the nature of the right to private and family life and the general conditions for balancing this right against various public interests. The remainder of the article lies in a systematic analysis of the case law of the ECtHR on cross-border surrogacy, which has the potential to harmonize national approaches by establishing a minimum standard of human rights protection. I pay particular attention to the principle of the best interests of the child, the interpretation of which is a decisive factor and can thus serve as a general starting point for the resolution of human rights cases arising from cross-border surrogacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Valc, 2025. "Towards an international consensus on cross-border surrogacy: the role of the European Court of Human Rights?," Medical Law Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 1-029..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:fwaf029.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:fwaf029.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/medlaw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.