IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/medlaw/v33y2025i1p7..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the promise of UK health data: considering the case for a charitable GP data trust

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline A B Redhead
  • Catherine Bowden
  • John Ainsworth
  • Nigel Burns
  • James Cunningham
  • Søren Holm
  • Sarah Devaney

Abstract

The UK National Health Service general practice (GP) patient data constitute a rich research resource, but collecting, managing, and sharing patient data present challenges. In May 2021, to address these challenges, substantial changes to the system for processing pseudonymized GP patient data in England were announced. As part of an opt-out process, patient consent to sharing GP data was deemed to have been given. However, when over a million people quickly acted to opt out of the new system, the process was paused, and an engagement exercise commenced, whose aim was to inform a re-designed programme addressing patient concerns. In this article, we present and discuss the findings of the General Practice Data Trust pilot study, which has investigated people’s reasons for opting out of sharing their data, and, looking for practical solutions to their concerns, has discussed with participants the concept of a ‘data trust’ to manage the sharing of patient data. Making a conceptual argument for the use of the (relatively new) charitable incorporated organization as a governance model for a GP data trust, we demonstrate how this could address patients’ concerns and represent a more attractive means of stewarding GP data for research and service planning purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline A B Redhead & Catherine Bowden & John Ainsworth & Nigel Burns & James Cunningham & Søren Holm & Sarah Devaney, 2025. "Unlocking the promise of UK health data: considering the case for a charitable GP data trust," Medical Law Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 1-7..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:7.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/medlaw/fwae043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:7.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/medlaw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.