IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v42y2026i1p221-246..html

Consumer default after the 2005 bankruptcy reform

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Albanesi
  • Jaromir Nosal

Abstract

The 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act is the most important reform of US personal bankruptcy legislation in recent years. It increased the monetary costs of both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy, while leaving benefits mostly unchanged. Using administrative credit bureau data from a nationally representative panel, we quantify the effects of the rise in filing costs by exploiting its geographical variation. We show the increase in filing costs reduced Chapter 7 bankruptcy rates by 15% for newly financially distressed borrowers, but had no statistically significant effect on Chapter 13. We argue this differential response is consistent with binding liquidity constraints. Additionally, we find that the missing Chapter 7 bankruptcies lead to increased rate of long term financial distress but also a limited rise in rate of returning to being current, while we find no evidence of substitution from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 filing or foreclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Albanesi & Jaromir Nosal, 2026. "Consumer default after the 2005 bankruptcy reform," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 221-246.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:42:y:2026:i:1:p:221-246.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewae030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:42:y:2026:i:1:p:221-246.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.