IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v33y2017i1p139-172..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buying up the Block: An Experimental Investigation of Capturing Economic Rents Through Sequential Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Gautam Goswami
  • Thomas Noe
  • Jun Wang

Abstract

This article analyzes an economic experiment designed to measure the effect of “legal technology” on the economic efficiency of Coasian bargaining. In the experiment, the agreement of many agents (called “landowners”) to transfer their property rights to a single agent (called “the developer”) generates an economic surplus. In this setting, we show that a very primitive legal technology sequential cash purchase (SC-P) is a strong implementation of a unique efficient bargaining outcome as a subgame perfect equilibrium. However, when deployed in the laboratory, SC-P results in an average loss of 60% of the economic surplus through inefficient negotiation failure. Deploying a more behaviorally robust but also more legally complex technology, a tender and conditional offer (TC-O) mechanism, halved the surplus loss and supported significant developer payoffs. These results suggest that, even absent asymmetric information, moral hazard, and transactions costs, complex legal technologies can increase bargaining efficiency. (JEL K11, D02, C70)

Suggested Citation

  • Gautam Goswami & Thomas Noe & Jun Wang, 2017. "Buying up the Block: An Experimental Investigation of Capturing Economic Rents Through Sequential Negotiations," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 139-172.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:33:y:2017:i:1:p:139-172.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/eww015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Korthals Altes, Willem K., 2019. "Planning initiative: Promoting development by the use of options in Amsterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-21.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:33:y:2017:i:1:p:139-172.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.