IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v13y1997i1p1-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The

Author

Listed:
  • Troesken, Werner

Abstract

I develop and test three theories of public ownership: a small markets hypothesis, a commitment hypothesis, and a patronage hypothesis. The empirical analysis employs a cross section of 1274 public and private gas companies operating in 1911. With these data, I find the following patterns: gas companies located in small towns were more likely to have been municipally owned than those in large towns; gas companies regulated by city councils were more likely to have been municipally owned than companies regulated that were unregulated; and gas companies regulated by state commissions were less likely to have been municipally owned than companies that were unregulated. Placed in their historical context, these results support the small markets and property rights interpretations of public ownership. Copyright 1997 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Troesken, Werner, 1997. "The," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:13:y:1997:i:1:p:1-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:13:y:1997:i:1:p:1-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.