IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v20y2025i6p423-431..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directive 98/44/EC and the European Patent Convention: challenges to the harmonization of biotechnology patenting in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Rob J Aerts

Abstract

Biotechnology patenting in Europe is governed by two separate legal bodies. The European Union (EU), by means of Directive 98/44/EC, has set the rules for the patentability of biotechnological subject matter, while the European Patent Convention (EPC) regulates the actual grant of European patents. The EU has no control over the intergovernmental EPC, since the Convention is outside of the EU legal order. In practice, the two systems are not always aligned and interactions between the systems can be unpredictable.EU rules pertaining to biotechnology patenting were taken over verbatim in subordinate secondary legislation to the EPC, not primary legislation. It may be questioned whether this step was helpful in attempting to harmonize biotechnology patenting in Europe. In practice, the rules in this secondary legislation can be completely ignored—or they can be duly taken into account. It is also possible that secondary legislation to the EPC is used to overrule a decision in the field of biotechnology patenting by the highest judiciary in the EPC system.The introduction of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court is an important new initiative by the EU. However, it does not fundamentally change the relationship between the EU and the EPC legal systems. Consequently, it does not change the existing situation regarding biotechnology patenting, since the actual granting procedure of European patents remains outside of the competence of the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Rob J Aerts, 2025. "Directive 98/44/EC and the European Patent Convention: challenges to the harmonization of biotechnology patenting in Europe," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 423-431.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:6:p:423-431.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:6:p:423-431.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.