IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v20y2025i5p339-353..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade mark dilemmas in the Metaverse: interplay between stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Alona Yarmak

Abstract

The opposite interests of the stakeholders in the Metaverse produce more and more legal uncertainty. The relationship between stakeholders is defined by the author as the triangle of opposite interests, where each interest shapes the development of the Metaverse.If we have too much freedom of expression for developers but little attention is dedicated to IP clearance in which interested trade mark holders find themselves, the Metaverse collapses because of the uncontrolled circulation of fake digital goods. In this situation, developers put pressure on the whole IP system. The value of digital goods decreases which evokes negative reputational consequences for the Metaverse. In contrast, constraints from trade mark holders are also dangerous because the Metaverse will stagnate, and designers will lock in limited creative choices. In this uncertainty, we need to balance conflicting interests and revise lessons from trade mark and technology history.This problem requires an examination of the European Union and the United State case law and scholarly comments because court practice tends to limit the fair use of trade marks in favour of trade mark holders. In contrast, scholars signal potential issues with this approach as overly limiting freedom of artistic expression.

Suggested Citation

  • Alona Yarmak, 2025. "Trade mark dilemmas in the Metaverse: interplay between stakeholders," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 339-353.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:5:p:339-353.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpae118
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:5:p:339-353.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.