IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v20y2025i1p8-15..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publicity of proceedings before the Unified Patent Court

Author

Listed:
  • Vilhelm Schröder

Abstract

On 1 June 2023, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) opened its doors. One of the most discussed and debated topics during the first year of operation of the UPC has been the publicity of the proceedings. This article discusses (i) access requests by the public, and (ii) restricting access within the proceedings.The court has now handed down several decisions on access requests by the public. Different approaches were adopted by the Munich section of the central division and the Nordic-Baltic regional division. The order by the latter division was appealed and we now have guidelines from the Court of Appeal on how the rules should be interpreted.The UPC has also given several orders related to the protection of trade secrets and confidential information within the proceedings. The questions the court has had to deal with are far from easy. They require careful balancing of several interests, such as publicity and confidentiality as well as the right to a fair trial. The Hague local division held that access to certain documents could be restricted only to legal representatives (‘attorneys’ eyes only’), where the relevant party had waived its right to review the documents. Generally, however, the UPC has in its orders allowed at least one natural person from each party to review all documents, which follows the wording of the Rules of Procedure. The Court of Appeal is yet to rule on these questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilhelm Schröder, 2025. "Publicity of proceedings before the Unified Patent Court," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 8-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:8-15.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpae082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:8-15.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.