IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v20y2025i1p46-60..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patents, gendered bodies and innovation: a case study on contraceptives

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica C Lai

Abstract

The Anthropocene, while a recently popularized term, is part of a long history theorizing human impact globally. Since the 1970s, a chief focus of modulating this impact was population control. While the Anthropocene is about the human impact on the Earth, to date, the contraceptive burden lies with women, using invasive technologies that can have highly detrimental side effects.This article uses patent records to consider the sources of this disparity, including how post-grant patent law theories based on incentives to innovate ignore gender narratives and the varying ways in which society evaluates different bodies, and how this has different consequences for invention and innovation.As we are not yet in a post-gender world, it is important that our post-grant patent theory considers gender. This is necessary if we are to meet the challenges that face all of humankind.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica C Lai, 2025. "Patents, gendered bodies and innovation: a case study on contraceptives," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 46-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:46-60.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpae096
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:46-60.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.