IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v20y2025i12p800-806..html

PMAC: not quite FRAND conciliation - a comparison with the EU SEP Regulation’s more ambitious attempt to resolve FRAND licensing disputes

Author

Listed:
  • Peter D Camesasca
  • Konstantina E Sideri

Abstract

The licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs) in the European Union (EU) is characterized by market asymmetries and power imbalances between the SEP holders and implementers, especially in the determination of what constitutes FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) licensing terms.In 2023, the European Commission proposed the EU SEP Regulation to address such market imbalances. Although the EU SEP Regulation was withdrawn in July 2025, it has spurred an extensive debate and offered good points for discussion and further consideration, especially from other fora that deal with SEP licensing disputes. In parallel, the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC) offers a more traditional mediation and arbitration model, which is voluntary, confidential and procedurally lighter. Recently, PMAC has launched a public consultation on its revised Mediation and Arbitration rules specifically tailored to SEP disputes.The comparison of these two models of alternative dispute resolution is of importance because, despite the withdrawal of the EU SEP Regulation, it provides useful guidance for PMAC to be transformed into a preferred, transparent and consistent forum for the resolution of SEP disputes, lifting it above already existing mediation and arbitration fora.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter D Camesasca & Konstantina E Sideri, 2025. "PMAC: not quite FRAND conciliation - a comparison with the EU SEP Regulation’s more ambitious attempt to resolve FRAND licensing disputes," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(12), pages 800-806.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:12:p:800-806.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:12:p:800-806.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.