IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v6y2003i3p761-769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EC Liability for the Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions -- Advocate General Alber Proposes a 'Copernican Innovation' in the Case Law of the ECJ

Author

Listed:
  • Geert A. Zonnekeyn

Abstract

In two identical Opinions delivered on 15 May 2003 in the Biret cases, Advocate General Alber of the European Court of Justice ('ECJ'), proposes that the European Community ('EC') may be held liable under EC law for the non-implementation of WTO dispute settlement decisions within the prescribed reasonable period of time and the damages resulting therefrom for economic operators. The Advocate General opines that, in such circumstances, WTO law has direct effect and can thus be invoked by private parties in proceedings before the European courts in Luxembourg in order to trigger the liability of the EC. It remains to be seen whether the ECJ will be prepared to follow the 'Copernican innovation' proposed by the Advocate General. This note does not purport to give an exhaustive analysis of the Opinions of the Advocate General. It will focus on some of the more controversial issues dealt with in both Opinions. Copyright Oxford University Press 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Geert A. Zonnekeyn, 2003. "EC Liability for the Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions -- Advocate General Alber Proposes a 'Copernican Innovation' in the Case Law of the ECJ," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 761-769, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:6:y:2003:i:3:p:761-769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:6:y:2003:i:3:p:761-769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.