IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v25y2022i4p548-567..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Agriculture Policy at the WTO: Insights from a New Quantitative Database

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Ann Jackson(OECD)
  • Federica Maggi(WTO)
  • Roberta Piermartini(WTO)
  • Stela Rubínová(WTO)

Abstract

In this paper, we build a quantitative database of the questions raised in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Committee on Agriculture (CoA) matching questions with the corresponding value of trade. Using this newly built database, we are able to show that (i) members’ concerns about trade policy measures applied by other members cover on average 16% of global trade in agriculture; (ii) the activity of the committee increases in the aftermath of a new agreement, during a food crisis and has shifted over time from questions about market access (MA) policies to questions on domestic support, thus pointing at the need to further cooperation on some of these issues; (iii) 20% of the questions relate to trade policy measures that have not been notified at the WTO, thus representing a significant source of information for researchers to fill the gaps in notifications; and (iv) there is a strong correlation between members participation in the CoA and their share of trade in agriculture, yet questions on seeds, oils and animal fats, cereals, and beverages are well above what one would expect on the basis of the trade importance of these sectors. These findings illustrate the importance of building quantitative databases from the information collected in WTO committees to analyse trends in trade policy concerns by members and factors affecting these trends and to assess the impact of discussions in committees on trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Ann Jackson(OECD) & Federica Maggi(WTO) & Roberta Piermartini(WTO) & Stela Rubínová(WTO), 2022. "Monitoring Agriculture Policy at the WTO: Insights from a New Quantitative Database," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 548-567.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:25:y:2022:i:4:p:548-567.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgac046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:25:y:2022:i:4:p:548-567.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.