IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v21y2018i4p885-905..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment

Author

Listed:
  • Sherzod Shadikhodjaev

Abstract

Anti-dumping is a fair trade mechanism of protecting domestic industries from certain underpriced imports. In December 2017, theEuropean Union made a remarkable amendment to its anti-dumping legislation to shift from a long-standing practice of specific dumping calculations for a pre-defined list of non-market economies to a ‘country-neutral’ approach of targeting significant market distortions. The new methodology requires the European Commission to use only prices and costs not influenced by substantial government interventions and to take account of some social and environmental dimensions in the anti-dumping process. Although the new methodology formally differs from the previous one, it is largely the same in addressing severe price distortions and being capable of inflating anti-dumping duties for affected products. In this article, we discuss major changes introduced by the 2017 amendment. While we agree with the earlier scholarly conclusions that the 2017 amendment is likely to fail to meet the World Trade Organization’s legal standards, we nevertheless justify the embedded anti-distortion policy as a reasonable way of making trade fairer and suggest taking proactive actions at the global level to render the new dumping methodology internationally acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherzod Shadikhodjaev, 2018. "Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 885-905.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:21:y:2018:i:4:p:885-905.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgy041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Men, 2022. "The EU and China: talk to each other or talk across each other," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 229-244, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:21:y:2018:i:4:p:885-905.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.