IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v19y2016i3p589-605..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the WTO's Approach to International Standards on Services Outdated?

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Gari

Abstract

This article reviews the role that international standards on services play in defining WTO Members’ rights and obligations. It argues that the growing importance of international standards on services with material implications—both positive and negative—for trade in services, questions the appropriateness of GATS’ restrained approach to these standards. It advocates for a new approach that: (i) gives international standards greater influence in disciplining WTO Members’ exercise of their regulatory autonomy,(ii) creates new and more effective mechanisms for institutional cooperation with relevant international standard setting bodies, and (iii) requests Members to encourage private standard setters to observe open and inclusive standard setting practices. It argues that the GATS’ embedded flexibility provides ample room for introducing the proposed changes without the need to reform the treaty and highlights the risks of continued rule-making paralysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Gari, 2016. "Is the WTO's Approach to International Standards on Services Outdated?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 589-605.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:589-605.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgw059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:589-605.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.