How to Pass a Pass-Through Test: The Case of Input Subsidies
The pass-through principle evolved from countervailing duty cases means that where a producer of a downstream product obtains a subsidized input from an upstream producer at arm's length, the investigating authority cannot presume, but rather must establish whether and to what extent the benefit of the input subsidy has actually been passed through downstream. The positive pass-through determination enables the importing country to impose a countervailing duty on the downstream product found to be indirectly subsidized. In this article, we show that the legal basis for the input subsidy pass-through goes beyond the scope of Part V of the SCM Agreement. We also argue that what necessitates the pass-through test is a market price paid by the downstream producer to the upstream producer, rather than the fact of corporate non-affiliation. Furthermore, the pass-through determination for all elements of the input subsidy should, in our opinion, be made at the levels of both direct and indirect subsidization. Finally, in the light of our observations, we suggest a few amendments to a proposed Doha Round text on the subsidy pass-through. The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 15 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://www.jiel.oupjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:15:y:2012:i:2:p:621-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.