IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v14y2011i2p469-503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antinomies of Public and Private at the Foundations of International Investment Law and Arbitration

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Mills

Abstract

International investment law has in recent years become a topic of great practical and academic importance, as the thousands of international investment treaties have given rise to hundreds of investor-state arbitrations, and innumerable books and articles. But fundamental questions concerning the regulatory character of international investment law, and what its aims and objectives are, remain the subject of contestation reflected in a variety of policy debates and in competing historical narratives regarding the development of the field.This article contends that two 'public--private' distinctions or antinomies lie behind this indeterminacy, at international investment law's uncertain foundations--the first dealing with the characterization of international investment law as a form of 'public' or 'private' law, and the second dealing with the balance that international investment law strikes between 'public' and 'private' interests or objectives. A number of disputed issues in international investment law and arbitration, which are presented at the surface as merely technical problems, may in reality, it is argued, be products of these deeper underlying theoretical uncertainties. Oxford University Press 2011, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Mills, 2011. "Antinomies of Public and Private at the Foundations of International Investment Law and Arbitration," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 469-503, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:469-503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgr020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:469-503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.