IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Protecting Public Morals in a Digital Age: Revisiting the WTO Rulings on US -- Gambling and China -- Publications and Audiovisual Products

Listed author(s):
  • Panagiotis Delimatsis
Registered author(s):

    Values such as promoting free trade in services or protecting public morality coexist in a perilous balance nowadays. This peril appears to be exacerbated by the manifold possibilities of supplying services that the digital age brings with it. Technological advances and innovations transform the manner that services are supplied and call for swift reaction by regulatory authorities. Furthermore, electronic communications erode long-standing traditions in regulating various services industries (supply side) and consumer behaviour (consumption side) and sometimes allow for easy circumvention of law. The US -- Gambling and China -- Audiovisual Products rulings are the first pronouncements of the World Trade Organization (WTO) judiciary on the possible clash between trade expansion, on the one hand, and protection of public morals, on the other. After a critical review of these two important recent rulings on the concept of public morality and its treatment by the WTO judiciary, the article goes on to discuss the changing scope of regulatory sovereignty regarding the protection of public morality in a digital landscape; the paradigm shift in regulatory approaches that technological advances bring about; and the role of courts and non-state actors in the regulation of cyberspace. Oxford University Press 2011, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Journal of International Economic Law.

    Volume (Year): 14 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 2 (June)
    Pages: 257-293

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:257-293
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK

    Fax: 01865 267 985
    Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:257-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.